Agnostic storm review — blind, anonymised peer review between agents on different models

What it is

1. Several agents analyse the same data independently.
2. Each agent then critiques the others' work anonymously.
3. The critiques come back as one summarized synthesis.

It is blind peer review among agents running on different models. Most people have never seen it, and in practice it has been very valuable.

Why "agnostic" is the deep part

wikiTaTa isn't tied to one model or one client. The turn-by-turn structure travels between them: Perplexity picked up the turn-by-turn discipline cleanly. That is live proof the pattern is independent of the substrate, not just "works with Claude."

Why it matters

A single model grading its own work has blind spots. A review by models from different vendors, with names hidden, catches what one model misses.